![atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg](http://www.profilsuccess.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/e1fa078d.jpg)
Of his samples only sparks was an actual scene release, but that is not a guarantee of the best quality, so it's healthy to question that.Īny group that takes care to not sacrifice the detail of the original source simply to render a smaller file deserves a download. the larger rips will always be better if they were encoded without errors.
![atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg](https://www.whatismymovie.com/t/images/146216.jpg)
It's not fair to compare the small rips to the larger ones, perhaps there was an error in methodology there. I don't think from his findings he has much of a clue what he's talking about, not that i'm any expert. Have you done (or do you have links to) any other such comparative reviews? If there are flaws in it then what should have have done differently?Īre there other factors (or encoders) he should have considered? I don't actually care that much.īut I do know that relative merits of encoders are often debated and this appears to have been a more rigorous comparative review than most one-sided fanboy rants, so I offer it here as a starting point.
![atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg](https://c4.staticflickr.com/6/5328/31326867995_cef2d8cdca_c.jpg)
Note that for most of them I have zoomed to "fit height to screen". See screenshots.Ĭaptures used while playing video in Media Player Classic Home Cinema, and saved lossless using IrfanView. And the 15GB rip handles noise better (noise in the video is hard for the encoders to capture at low bitrates) which gives it a small but noticeable improvement in detail. But there is a small but noteable difference in sharpness when going from VISION to the 10GB rip. Anoxmous was second from the bottom, but he usually does very good rips.ġ0-15GB rips: If you don't have a giant screen then don't bother with these. SPARKS surprises me a bit, would have expected better quality for a 6,6GB rip.
![atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg atomic blonde torrent yify etrg rarbg](https://ytstvmovies.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/YTS-TV-MOVIES.png)
#ATOMIC BLONDE TORRENT YIFY ETRG RARBG 1080P#
So one thing to learn from this is: If you squeeze 1080p into a very small file then the quality migh end up being lower than rips encoded as 720p. I recommend going for VISION, which also has 6ch audio of excellent quality (to have use for higher quality audio than that you need a $100000 speaker setup and perfect hearing, trust me). DL.x264-LTT 2.7 GBĪudio (figures denote typ/max bitrates, data is usually from MediaInfo tool): SPARKS 6CH DTS 1509kbps, VISION 6CH AAC 445/664kbps, KINGDOM 6CH AAC 320/334kbps, Anoxmous 6CH 375kbps & 2CH 124kbps AAC, YIFY 2CH AAC 93/105kbps.Ĭonclusions among 1-7GB rips: KINGDOM/YIFY/VISION/SPARKS have the same video quality level (negligible differences, and the bigger files are not better), Anoxmous and LTT have noteably lower richness in details. Gravity 2013 1080p BRRIP x264 AAC KiNGDOM 3.49 GB And recommend surround sound.ĭownloaded these, some screenshots are enclosed:
#ATOMIC BLONDE TORRENT YIFY ETRG RARBG MOVIE#
I did all this since Gravity really needs a big screen (mine is 110") and high resolution since a lot of the joy of watching it is the pans in space with graphically fascinating images of Earth etc in the background, you really feel like you're in space - watch it on a 25" b/w set and it's mostly a rather boring movie (except for Clooneys witty remarks). I put some effort into comparing quality of Gravity HD rips, might as well share it, especially since none have screenshots and few have samples. Gravity 2013 SCREENSHOTS (YIFY, SPARKS, ANOXMOUS, LTT, PUBLICHD, VISION, KINGDOM)